United States v. Almendarez-Torres

113 F.3d 515, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41381, 1996 WL 887502
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 1996
DocketNo. 96-10254
StatusPublished

This text of 113 F.3d 515 (United States v. Almendarez-Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Almendarez-Torres, 113 F.3d 515, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41381, 1996 WL 887502 (5th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Hugo Roman Almendarez-Torres appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence after pleading guilty to reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that he was charged with and pleaded guilty to § 1326(a), simple reentry, but that he was sentenced as if he had pleaded guilty to reentry following a conviction for an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2). His argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999 F.2d 943 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1076, 114 S.Ct. 889, 127 L.Ed.2d 82 (1994).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jose Blas Vasquez-Olvera
999 F.2d 943 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 F.3d 515, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41381, 1996 WL 887502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-almendarez-torres-ca5-1996.