United States v. Alltransport, Inc.

44 C.C.P.A. 149
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedApril 30, 1957
DocketNo. 4903
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 C.C.P.A. 149 (United States v. Alltransport, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alltransport, Inc., 44 C.C.P.A. 149 (ccpa 1957).

Opinions

Rich, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal by the Government from the judgment of the United States Customs Court (C. D. 1807), overriding the action of the Collector of Customs at the Port of New York and sustaining the importer’s protests thereto.

The Customs Court accurately described the imports as follows:

The merchandise consists of what are known as absorbable gelatin sponges. They are sponges made of pure gelatin, not medicated in any way, and used in surgery to stop excessive capillary and venous bleeding by bringing about a firm, adherent blood clot. They also help the surgeon to maintain a clean field so that it is not necessary to continually remove blood from the area of the surgery. After the clot is formed, the sponges are left inside the patient and are absorbed by the system of the patient within a period of from 4 to 6 weeks, disappearing without any trace.

We add that they are imported in sterile packages ready for use.

The merchandise was classified by the collector under the provisions of paragraph 41 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as manufactures of gelatin, and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under that paragraph as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802.

The importer protested the above classification and assessment, claiming the merchandise was properly classifiable as medicinal prep[151]*151arations under the provisions of paragraph 5, Tariff Act of 1930, and assessable at the rate of 12% per centum ad valorem under that paragraph as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739.

The statutes involved are as follows:

Paragraph 41 as modified by T. D. 51802:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Inabata Specialty Chemicals v. United States
366 F. Supp. 2d 1358 (Court of International Trade, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 C.C.P.A. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alltransport-inc-ccpa-1957.