United States v. Allen Loughry, II

996 F.3d 729
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Allen Loughry, II. Read the opinion of the Court — 983 F.3d 698
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2021·No. 19-4137·Published

Opinion

PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-4137

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ALLEN H. LOUGHRY, II,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:18-cr-00134-1)

Argued: May 3, 2021 Decided: May 20, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, MOTZ, AGEE, KEENAN, WYNN, DIAZ, FLOYD, HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. *

Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Elbert Lin, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Gregory McVey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Nicholas D. Stellakis, Boston,

* Judge King, Judge Thacker, and Judge Rushing took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Massachusetts, Katy Boatman, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP, Houston, Texas, for Appellant. Michael B. Stuart, United States Attorney, Philip H. Wright, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

2 PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Allen Loughry, II, 996 F.3d 729 (4th Cir. 2021).

996 F.3d 729 (United States v. Allen Loughry, II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.