United States v. Allen

20 C.M.A. 180, 20 USCMA 180, 43 C.M.R. 20, 1970 CMA LEXIS 672, 1970 WL 7417
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided December 4, 1970·No. No. 23,097·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Allen, in writing, chose to be tried by military judge alone. The signed, printed form indicates, however, that he made such a request with apparent knowledge only of his right to be tried by a court-martial composed of commissioned officers. Advice that he had a right to have the court-martial panel composed of one-third enlisted men was omitted. This same omission was considered in United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970). The issue was decided against that appellant. For the reasons stated in that opinion, we affirm the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Allen, 20 C.M.A. 180, 20 USCMA 180, 43 C.M.R. 20, 1970 CMA LEXIS 672, 1970 WL 7417 (cma 1970).

20 C.M.A. 180 (United States v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Smith
13 C.M.A. 105 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1962)
United States v. Fortier
19 C.M.A. 149 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)
United States v. Jenkins
20 C.M.A. 112 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Bowman
20 C.M.A. 119 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Turner
20 C.M.A. 167 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)