United States v. Allen
This text of United States v. Allen (United States v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 25-30138 Document: 43-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/05/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 25-30138 January 5, 2026 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Ronald W. Allen, Jr.,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:24-CV-304 ______________________________
Before Jones, Richman, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Ronald W. Allen, Jr., federal prisoner # 20776-035, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal of the district court’s order striking his motion to proceed IFP in his appeal of the district court’s order denying him a certificate of appealability (COA). This court dismissed
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-30138 Document: 43-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/05/2026
No. 25-30138
Allen’s appeal of the district court’s order denying him a COA on March 11, 2025. See United States v. Allen, No. 24-30788 (5th Cir. Mar. 11, 2025). “Whether an appeal is moot is a jurisdictional matter, since it implicates the Article III requirement that there be a live case or controversy.” Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). “In the absence of its being raised by a party, this court is obliged to raise the subject of mootness sua sponte.” Id. Because this court has dismissed Allen’s appeal of the district court’s order denying him a COA, any appellate challenge to the district court’s striking of his motion to appeal that order IFP is moot, and this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it. See McRae v. Hogan, 576 F.2d 615, 617 (5th Cir. 1978). The appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT, and his motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Allen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-allen-ca5-2026.