United States v. Allen
91 F. App'x 967
Opinion
The court has considered the appellant’s argument in light of oral argument, the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Allen, 91 F. App'x 967 (5th Cir. 2004).
91 F. App'x 967 (United States v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.