United States v. Allen
This text of United States v. Allen (United States v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6067
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EMMA J. ALLEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-91-44, CA-97-249)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 31, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emma J. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Ann Colombell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Emma J. Allen seeks to appeal the district court's order deny-
ing her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Allen, Nos. CR-91-44; CA-97-
249 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Allen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-allen-ca4-2000.