United States v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided August 22, 1996·No. 96-1263·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 96-1263

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

CARLTON E. ALLEN,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Robert A. Levine on brief for appellant. ________________
Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, Jonathan R. Chapman and ________________ ____________________
F. Mark Terison, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for ________________
appellee.

____________________

August 22, 1996
____________________

Per Curiam. The defendant appeals his conviction __________

for possession of a short barrel shotgun in violation of 26

U.S.C. 5861(d), contending that the gun was found as the

result of a pretextual stop of his vehicle by the police.

Because this case is controlled by the recent decision in

Whren v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 1769 (1996), we affirm the _____ _____________

judgment below.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. ________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Allen, (1st Cir. 1996).

United States v. Allen (United States v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whren v. United States
517 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1996)