United States v. Ali Sofyan

203 F. App'x 756
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 2006
Docket05-3448
StatusUnpublished

This text of 203 F. App'x 756 (United States v. Ali Sofyan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ali Sofyan, 203 F. App'x 756 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ali Abdul-Azez Sofyan appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after granting the government’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce Sofyan’s sentence for his substantial assistance. On appeal, Sofyan’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which counsel makes reference to the extent of the reduction in Sofyan’s sentence. We have no jurisdiction, however, to review the extent of the district court’s Rule 35(b) sentencing departure, see United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir.1998) (per curiam), and upon our independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Ricky Coppedge
135 F.3d 598 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 F. App'x 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ali-sofyan-ca8-2006.