United States v. Ali Sofyan

203 F. App'x 756
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2006·No. 05-3448·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ali Abdul-Azez Sofyan appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after granting the government’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce Sofyan’s sentence for his substantial assistance. On appeal, Sofyan’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which counsel makes reference to the extent of the reduction in Sofyan’s sentence. We have no jurisdiction, however, to review the extent of the district court’s Rule 35(b) sentencing departure, see United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir.1998) (per curiam), and upon our independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ali Sofyan, 203 F. App'x 756 (8th Cir. 2006).

203 F. App'x 756 (United States v. Ali Sofyan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Ricky Coppedge
135 F.3d 598 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)