United States v. Ali Sofyan
This text of 203 F. App'x 756 (United States v. Ali Sofyan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ali Abdul-Azez Sofyan appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after granting the government’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce Sofyan’s sentence for his substantial assistance. On appeal, Sofyan’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which counsel makes reference to the extent of the reduction in Sofyan’s sentence. We have no jurisdiction, however, to review the extent of the district court’s Rule 35(b) sentencing departure, see United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir.1998) (per curiam), and upon our independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 F. App'x 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ali-sofyan-ca8-2006.