United States v. Alfredo Iriarte-Ortega
This text of 127 F.3d 1200 (United States v. Alfredo Iriarte-Ortega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion filed May 9, 1997 [113 F.3d 1022], is amended as follows:
Slip op. pg. 5492, lines 11-12 [113 F.3d at 1024]:
Change “fifteen years” to “146 months”.
*1201 Slip op. pg. 5492, footnote 1, line 1 [113 F.3d at 1024]:
Add ‘Triarte challenges only the first element, i.e., that he entered an agreement to accomplish an illegal objective. See Brief for Appellant at 26 (“The failure of proof in this case lies entirely in the failure to prove that any agreement was ever made and that Mr. Triarte knowingly and intentionally joined some agreement.”) (emphasis omitted).”.
Start the next sentence in footnote 1 (“Both the government and Iriarte ...”) as a new paragraph.
The petition for rehearing is otherwise denied. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en bane and no active judge has requested a vote thereon. The suggestion for rehearing en banc is therefore rejected. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 F.3d 1200, 1997 WL 684941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alfredo-iriarte-ortega-ca9-1997.