United States v. Alfreda Robinson, Claimant-Appellant, and 51 Caraway Road
This text of 53 F.3d 329 (United States v. Alfreda Robinson, Claimant-Appellant, and 51 Caraway Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
53 F.3d 329
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alfreda ROBINSON, Claimant-Appellant,
and
51 CARAWAY ROAD, Defendant.
No. 94-1928.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 10, 1995.
Alfreda Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), to set aside the summary judgment entered against her in this civil forfeiture case. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Robinson, No. CA-92-845-JFM (D. Md. June 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.3d 329, 1995 WL 272514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alfreda-robinson-claimant-appellan-ca4-1995.