United States v. Alfred Gonzales Fierro
This text of 462 F.2d 1376 (United States v. Alfred Gonzales Fierro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
462 F.2d 1376
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alfred Gonzales FIERRO et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 71-2787, 71-2963 and 71-3011.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 1, 1972.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; David W. Williams, Judge.
H. Jesse Arnelle (argued), Stanley A. Doten, of Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton & Clark, San Francisco, Cal., Jacque Boyle (argued), William C. Miller, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants.
Stanley I. Greenberg, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this case involving counterfeit currency we affirm the judgments of conviction.
We find no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 F.2d 1376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alfred-gonzales-fierro-ca9-1972.