United States v. Alfred
This text of United States v. Alfred (United States v. Alfred) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ____________________
No. 00-31480 Summary Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARRY ALFRED,
Defendant-Appellant. ____________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (00-CR-205-ALL-C) ____________________________________________________________ August 20, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
In appealing his conviction for being a felon in possession of
a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), Larry Alfred
presents three issues. Alfred pointed the firearm at another. The
issues turn on evidence admitted or excluded at trial.
Concerning these issues, the district court did not abuse its
discretion by (1) excluding testimony, see Jones v. Southern Pac.
R.R., 962 F.2d 447, 450 (5th Cir. 1992); (2) admitting hearsay
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. evidence, see FED. R. EVID. 803, Advisory Committee Notes; and
(3) denying his motion for a new trial, see United States v.
McWaine, 243 F.3d 871, 874 (5th Cir. 2001).
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Alfred, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alfred-ca5-2001.