United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov

458 F.2d 1360
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 1, 1972·No. 72-1062·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. The statements of Armenteros inculpating Ninov made during the commission of the crime were properly admitted into evidence, given the independent evidence of concert of action between the two. Migliore v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 786; United States v. Williams, 9 Cir., 1970, 435 F.2d 642; United States v. Bey, 3 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 188. In addition, there is no merit in the assignments of error based on an alleged insufficiency of the evidence.

1

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov, 458 F.2d 1360 (5th Cir. 1972).

458 F.2d 1360 (United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related