United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov

458 F.2d 1360
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 1972
Docket72-1062
StatusPublished

This text of 458 F.2d 1360 (United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov, 458 F.2d 1360 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. The statements of Armenteros inculpating Ninov made during the commission of the crime were properly admitted into evidence, given the independent evidence of concert of action between the two. Migliore v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 786; United States v. Williams, 9 Cir., 1970, 435 F.2d 642; United States v. Bey, 3 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 188. In addition, there is no merit in the assignments of error based on an alleged insufficiency of the evidence.

1

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 F.2d 1360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alfonso-eduardo-ninov-ca5-1972.