United States v. Alfonso Acosta

509 F.2d 539
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alfonso Acosta. Read the opinion of the Court — 501 F.2d 1330
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 4, 1975·No. 73--4016·Published

Opinion

509 F.2d 539

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alfonso ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 73--4016.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

March 7, 1975.
Rehearing Denied April 4, 1975.

Raymond C. Caballero, El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

William S. Sessions, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Edward Marquez, Ronald F. Ederer, Asst. U.S. Attys., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Court adopts that part of the dissenting opinion of the panel dealing with 'The Sentencing Procedure' and vacates the sentence and remands the case for further sentencing, 501 F.2d 1330.

The Court, en banc, having considered the opinion and the judgment of the panel dealing with the admissibility of the evidence seized from Acosta's premises, is equally divided on this issue. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed by an evenly divided Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alfonso Acosta, 509 F.2d 539 (5th Cir. 1975).

509 F.2d 539 (United States v. Alfonso Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Alfonso Acosta
501 F.2d 1330 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)