United States v. Alferahin
This text of 324 F. App'x 623 (United States v. Alferahin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Osama Musa Alferahin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, see Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 662, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977), and we affirm.
As a preliminary matter, we decline to dismiss this appeal under the doctrine of fugitive disentitlement. See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez, 300 F.3d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir.2002).
However, we agree with the district court that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit a second trial. See Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 14-16, 98 S.Ct. 2141, 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978); United States v. Cote, 51 F.3d 178, 181-83 (9th Cir.1995).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F. App'x 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alferahin-ca9-2009.