United States v. Alexis

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Alexis

447 F. App'x 966

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 30, 2011·No. No. 10-14881·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

E. Brian Lang, appointed counsel for Guerly Alexis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Alexis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

E. Brian Lang, appointed counsel for Guerly Alexis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Alexis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Alexis, 447 F. App'x 966 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

447 F. App'x 966 (United States v. Alexis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related