United States v. Alexandro Necochea-Valera

539 F. App'x 707
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 2013
Docket12-50541
StatusUnpublished

This text of 539 F. App'x 707 (United States v. Alexandro Necochea-Valera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alexandro Necochea-Valera, 539 F. App'x 707 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Alexandra Necochea-Valera appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Contrary to Necochea’s assertion, the district court did not clearly err in denying him a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). See United States v. Hursh, 217 F.3d 761, 770 (9th Cir.2000) (denial of minor role adjustment not clear error where the defendant was the sole driver and occupant of a car in which a substantial amount of drugs were hidden).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Raohl Hursh
217 F.3d 761 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 F. App'x 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alexandro-necochea-valera-ca9-2013.