United States v. Alexander

24 F. Cas. 769, 4 D.C. 311, 4 Cranch 311

This text of 24 F. Cas. 769 (United States v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alexander, 24 F. Cas. 769, 4 D.C. 311, 4 Cranch 311 (circtddc 1833).

Opinion

Cranch, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court,

(Thruston, J., absent.)

We think the demurrers in this case must be supported —

1. Because, by the plaintiff’s bill, it appears that the charter of the bank expired in 1822,' and the bill was not filed until 1825 ; so that the defendants were not indebted to the bank at the time of filing the bill.

2. Because the bill joins several defendants who have no connection with each other in interest, in estate, or in contract, and against whom, jointly, the plaintiffs have no cause of suit either at law or in equity.

[312]*3123. Because the bill does not show an assignment of the debts, ov any agreement to assign, with the assent of the defendants.

4. Because there is no representative of the bank before the Court, to controvert the assignment.

We are of opinion, therefore, that the bill ought to be dismissed as to the defendants who have demurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 769, 4 D.C. 311, 4 Cranch 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alexander-circtddc-1833.