United States v. Alexander

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alexander. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 F. App'x 992
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 9, 2005·No. 05-50718·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50718 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

QUINCY LAMAR ALEXANDER,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-11-ALL --------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Quincy Lamar

Alexander raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States

v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held

that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render

21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alexander, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Alexander (United States v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)