United States v. Alexander

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Alexander

651 F. App'x 191

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2016·No. No. 16-6239·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony Bernard Alexander appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for early termination of his supervised release and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2016 & Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony Bernard Alexander appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for early termination of his supervised release and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2016 & Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Alexander, 651 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

651 F. App'x 191 (United States v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.