United States v. Alexander
This text of 651 F. App'x 191 (United States v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tony Bernard Alexander appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for early termination of his supervised release and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2016 & Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 F. App'x 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alexander-ca4-2016.