United States v. Alex Wilson Carnley, Charles Edward Prater, and Billy Ray Owensby

289 F.2d 63, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4878
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1961
Docket8268_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 F.2d 63 (United States v. Alex Wilson Carnley, Charles Edward Prater, and Billy Ray Owensby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alex Wilson Carnley, Charles Edward Prater, and Billy Ray Owensby, 289 F.2d 63, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4878 (4th Cir. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of coram nobis by three young men who had pleaded guilty to three separate indictments. One indictment charged an assault with a deadly weapon committed upon a government employee at Natural Bridge Camp, Greenlee, Virginia, a government rehabilitation camp for boys. They were at the time inmates committed to that institution for earlier offenses. The second indictment was for the interstate transportation of a stolen automobile. The third charged theft of property exceeding $100.00 from a government reservation.

The appellants complain of certain statements made in open court after the entry of the pleas and before the im *64 position of sentence. Not only did their counsel interpose no protest against the statements or attempt to controvert them, or object to the proceedings at the time, but it has not been suggested either in the trial court then or later, when they petitioned for a writ of coram nobis, how their rights were in any manner impaired or adversely affected. Nor do they indicate even in this court what procedures the trial court should have followed in sentencing. Moreover, they do not suggest what facts, if the case were remanded, they would wish to bring to the court’s attention that were not or could not have been adduced at the original sentencing hearing.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rakes v. United States
231 F. Supp. 812 (W.D. Virginia, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 F.2d 63, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alex-wilson-carnley-charles-edward-prater-and-billy-ray-ca4-1961.