United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway

476 F.2d 639, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10470
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 1973
Docket72-2769
StatusPublished

This text of 476 F.2d 639 (United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway, 476 F.2d 639, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10470 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered that the motion filed by Harry Connick, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521; United States v. Crawford, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 F.2d 639, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alex-nolan-and-dun-dun-hemingway-ca5-1973.