United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway
This text of 476 F.2d 639 (United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered that the motion filed by Harry Connick, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521; United States v. Crawford, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 F.2d 639, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alex-nolan-and-dun-dun-hemingway-ca5-1973.