Home/Fifth Circuit/United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway

United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway

476 F.2d 639, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10470
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 17, 1973·No. 72-2769·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered that the motion filed by Harry Connick, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521; United States v. Crawford, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway, 476 F.2d 639, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10470 (5th Cir. 1973).

476 F.2d 639 (United States v. Alex Nolan and Dun Dun Hemingway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Charles Edward Minor, No. 30544 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409
444 F.2d 521 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Joseph Calvin Crawford, A/K/A J. C. Crawford, No. 30632 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5th Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
446 F.2d 1085 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)