United States v. Alex De Acetis

441 F.2d 592, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10721
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 1971
Docket26493
StatusPublished

This text of 441 F.2d 592 (United States v. Alex De Acetis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alex De Acetis, 441 F.2d 592, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10721 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alex De Acetis appeals from his conviction for refusing induction into the armed forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. Appellant’s sole argument on appeal is that his local board’s refusal to allow witnesses to testify in his behalf at his personal appearance denied him rights under the applicable federal regulations, 32 C.F.R. §§ 1624.1(b), 1624.2 (b), and deprived him of due process in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

The issue has been settled adversely to appellant in United States v. Evans, 425 F.2d 302, 304 (9th Cir. 1970) and in Uffelman v. United States, 230 F.2d 297, 303 (9th Cir. 1956). The hearing before the local board met the standards of due process.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wesley Lawrence Uffelman v. United States
230 F.2d 297 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
United States v. Stephen R. Evans
425 F.2d 302 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F.2d 592, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alex-de-acetis-ca9-1971.