United States v. Alex Chin

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2024
Docket23-4621
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Alex Chin (United States v. Alex Chin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alex Chin, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4621 Doc: 33 Filed: 05/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-4621

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ALEX KAI TICK CHIN,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:22–cr–00087–1)

Submitted: March 29, 2024 Decided: May 30, 2024

Before WYNN, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: William S. Thompson, United States Attorney, Jennifer Rada Herrald, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Sebastian M. Joy, JOY LAW OFFICE, Catlettsburg, Kentucky, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-4621 Doc: 33 Filed: 05/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Alex Kai Tick Chin has been charged with various sex offenses pursuant

to a three-count second superseding indictment. In this interlocutory appeal, the

government challenges the district court’s decision, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence

414, to preclude it from introducing evidence of Chin’s previous conviction for possession

of child pornography. See United States v. Chin, No. CR 3:22-00087, 2023 WL 6446201,

at *4 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 2023). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731.

We vacate and remand the district court’s order for further consideration in light of

our recent decision in United States v. Hoover, 95 F.4th 763, 772 (4th Cir. 2024). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Michael Hoover
95 F.4th 763 (Fourth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Alex Chin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alex-chin-ca4-2024.