United States v. Aleman-Padilla
This text of 104 F. App'x 663 (United States v. Aleman-Padilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Abel Aleman-Padilla appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for [664]*664illegal re-entry after deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), enhanced by (b)(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Aleman-Padilla has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Aleman-Padilla has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government has not filed a responding brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F. App'x 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aleman-padilla-ca9-2004.