United States v. Aldolfo Gomez-Geraldo A/K/A Adolfo Ramirez A/K/A Adolfo Gomez
This text of 652 F.2d 452 (United States v. Aldolfo Gomez-Geraldo A/K/A Adolfo Ramirez A/K/A Adolfo Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to defendant’s argument, a ten-year sentence on a single count charging conspiracy to import both cocaine and marijuana is not a general sentence in violation of Benson v. United States, 332 F.2d 288 (5th Cir. 1964). Nor is it an illegal sentence because it exceeds the five-year sentence permitted by 21 U.S.C.A. § 960(b)(2) when only marijuana is involved. The jury by special verdict found that both cocaine and marijuana were the objects of the conspiracy. Fifteen years is the maximum sentence for a cocaine offense. 21 U.S.C.A. § 960(b)(1). The same is true for defendant’s ten-year sentence on a single count charging importation of both cocaine and marijuana. The district court’s denial of a Rule 35, Fed.R.Crim.P., motion is affirmed.
The special parole term of three years added to the ten-year sentence for conspiracy conviction was imposed improperly under Bifulco v. United States, 447 U.S. 381, 100 S.Ct. 2247, 65 L.Ed.2d 205 (1980), and is hereby vacated. United States v. Ayala, 643 F.2d 244, 248 (5th Cir. 1981).
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
652 F.2d 452, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 10840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aldolfo-gomez-geraldo-aka-adolfo-ramirez-aka-adolfo-ca5-1981.