United States v. Aldo Tarallo
This text of 413 F.3d 928 (United States v. Aldo Tarallo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION
The opinion filed August 20, 2004, is amended as follows:
On slip opinion page 11814, and published at 380 F.3d 1174, 1196 (9th Cir.2004), delete footnote 9 and add the following sentence to the conclusion at the end of the opinion: “The remainder of the sentence is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).”
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Graber has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges D.W. Nelson and Gibson have so recommended.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.
The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
413 F.3d 928, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 12897, 2005 WL 1523553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aldo-tarallo-ca9-2005.