United States v. Alcantara-Mendez
This text of 486 F. App'x 359 (United States v. Alcantara-Mendez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Enoc Alcantara-Mendez appeals the district court’s orders committing him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006) and denying his motions for reconsideration. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court did not err in finding that Alcantara-Mendez met the criteria for commitment and did not err in denying his motions for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 F. App'x 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alcantara-mendez-ca4-2012.