United States v. Alcala-Ramos
This text of 14 F. App'x 878 (United States v. Alcala-Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ignacio Alcala-Ramos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Alcala-Ramos contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court should not have imposed a sentence greater than the two-year maximum set forth in § 1326(a) based on Alacala-Ramos’ prior aggravated felony because that felony was neither charged in the indictment nor admitted at the change of plea. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F. App'x 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alcala-ramos-ca9-2001.