United States v. Albutus Powell

453 F.2d 885, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 12042
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 1972
Docket71-1581
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 453 F.2d 885 (United States v. Albutus Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Albutus Powell, 453 F.2d 885, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 12042 (6th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from his conviction for possession of stolen mail in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1708. No challenge is made to the evidence of the possession of the check allegedly stolen from the mails, but the appellant claims that the proof that the check involved was removed from the United States mails was not sufficient. The Government introduced evidence as to the routine by which such checks issued by the Auditor of the State of Ohio were handled by the State of Ohio and placed in the mails.

We agree with the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which Court stated in Webb v. United States, 347 F.2d 363, 364 (1965):

“We have no doubt that the proof of the routine procedures * * * in the preparation and mailing of *- * * checks is sufficient to support a permissible inference that this particular check reached the United States mails. It is true that the testimony relating to mailing does not single out the particular check in any manner nor does it negate all possibilities that might strip appellant’s possession of the cheek of its criminal aspects. But the jury’s function is broad enough to allow it to make common sense inferences from proven facts and the burden of the Government in this type of case does not require it to negate all unlikely but possible facets of innocence.”

We are satisfied that the Government’s proof of the usual manner of preparation and mailing of checks such as the one involved in this case was sufficient to permit the jury to conclude *886 that the cheek had been properly placed in the United States mails and stolen therefrom.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Arthur Clark
929 F.2d 702 (Sixth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Louis Fernando Gomez, Jr.
636 F.2d 295 (Tenth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 F.2d 885, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 12042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-albutus-powell-ca6-1972.