United States v. Alberto Castro (89-1528), Ignacio Forte (89-1530), Guillermo Rocha (89-1531), Jaime Giraldo (89-1893), Norberto Giraldo (89-1894)

914 F.2d 258
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 1990
Docket89-1528
StatusUnpublished

This text of 914 F.2d 258 (United States v. Alberto Castro (89-1528), Ignacio Forte (89-1530), Guillermo Rocha (89-1531), Jaime Giraldo (89-1893), Norberto Giraldo (89-1894)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alberto Castro (89-1528), Ignacio Forte (89-1530), Guillermo Rocha (89-1531), Jaime Giraldo (89-1893), Norberto Giraldo (89-1894), 914 F.2d 258 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

914 F.2d 258

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alberto CASTRO (89-1528), Ignacio Forte (89-1530), Guillermo
Rocha (89-1531), Jaime Giraldo (89-1893), Norberto
Giraldo (89-1894), Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 89-1528, 89-1530, 89-1531, 89-1893 and 89-1894.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 5, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in No. 89-1893 Sept.
18, 1990.

Before RALPH B. GUY, Jr., and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

After remand of these consolidated cases for resolution of the limited issue of the admissibility of co-conspirator statements, this court having affirmed the judgment of the district court in all other respects and having retained jurisdiction over these cases pending the district court's finding; and

Upon receipt of the district court's findings that the government demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that a conspiracy existed, the defendants against whom the government introduced hearsay statements were participants in the conspiracy, the statements were made in the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy, and therefore that the hearsay statements by co-conspirators are admissible,

The judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed in its entirety.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tomlin (J. Michael) v. Tsc Industries, Inc
914 F.2d 258 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 F.2d 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alberto-castro-89-1528-ignacio-for-ca6-1990.