United States v. Albert William Lacy
This text of 23 F.3d 404 (United States v. Albert William Lacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
23 F.3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Albert William LACY, Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-7065.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 6, 1994.
Albert William Lacy, Appellant pro se.
Amy Michelle Lecocq, Michael Lee Keller, Office of the U.S. Atty., Charleston, WV, for appellee.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lacy, Nos. CR-88-35; CA-93-345-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F.3d 404, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18600, 1994 WL 170714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-albert-william-lacy-ca4-1994.