United States v. Albert Keith Webster

611 F.2d 623, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21200
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1980
Docket79-5013
StatusPublished

This text of 611 F.2d 623 (United States v. Albert Keith Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Albert Keith Webster, 611 F.2d 623, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21200 (5th Cir. 1980).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 14, 1979, 5 Cir., 1979, 606 F.2d 581).

Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, JR., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Albert Keith Webster
606 F.2d 581 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
611 F.2d 623, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-albert-keith-webster-ca5-1980.