United States v. Albert J. Marnoch

Third Circuit

United States v. Albert J. Marnoch

382 F.2d 1019

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 25, 1967·No. 16351·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the evidence amply supported the verdict of guilty rendered by then District Court Judge Van Dusen to whom the case was tried without a jury, and that there is no basis for the defendant’s contention that some of the evidence was obtained in violation of his privilege against self-incrimination.

The judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the evidence amply supported the verdict of guilty rendered by then District Court Judge Van Dusen to whom the case was tried without a jury, and that there is no basis for the defendant’s contention that some of the evidence was obtained in violation of his privilege against self-incrimination.

The judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

United States v. Albert J. Marnoch, 382 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

382 F.2d 1019 (United States v. Albert J. Marnoch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.