United States v. Albert J. Marnoch

Third Circuit

United States v. Albert J. Marnoch

382 F.2d 1019

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedOctober 25, 1967

Docket16351

StatusPublished

This text of 382 F.2d 1019 (United States v. Albert J. Marnoch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Albert J. Marnoch, 382 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the evidence amply supported the verdict of guilty rendered by then District Court Judge Van Dusen to whom the case was tried without a jury, and that there is no basis for the defendant’s contention that some of the evidence was obtained in violation of his privilege against self-incrimination.

The judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the evidence amply supported the verdict of guilty rendered by then District Court Judge Van Dusen to whom the case was tried without a jury, and that there is no basis for the defendant’s contention that some of the evidence was obtained in violation of his privilege against self-incrimination.

The judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

382 F.2d 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-albert-j-marnoch-ca3-1967.