United States v. Albert J. Desantis

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Albert J. Desantis

977 F.2d 583, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37705

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 1992

Docket92-3974

StatusUnpublished

This text of 977 F.2d 583 (United States v. Albert J. Desantis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Albert J. Desantis, 977 F.2d 583, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37705 (6th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

977 F.2d 583

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Albert J. DeSANTIS, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 92-3974, 92-3978.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 30, 1992.

Before DAVID A. NELSON and SILER, Circuit Judges, and MILES, Senior District Judge.*

ORDER

The defendant appeals a district court order revoking his probation and imposing the defendant's original sentence of incarceration. That appeal has been docketed herein as Case No. 92-3978. The defendant is also appealing a district court order denying his request for bail pending his appeal of the revocation order. That appeal has been docketed as Case No. 92-3974. The defendant now moves this court for release and for expedited consideration of both appeals. The government has filed a response in opposition and the defendant has filed a motion to supplement. Upon review and consideration of the arguments presented, the court concludes that the defendant has not satisfied the criteria for release as established in 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b). Neither has the defendant demonstrated "exceptional circumstances" warranting his release. See United States v. Bell, 820 F.2d 980, 981 (9th Cir.1987).

For the stated reasons, the court AFFIRMS the order of the district court denying bail in Case No. 92-3974 and DENIES the motion for bail in Case No. 92-3978. It is further ORDERED that the motion to expedite the appeal in Case No. 92-3978 is granted. The clerk shall expedite the briefing schedule and advise the parties accordingly. Oral argument or submission shall be scheduled as soon as possible upon completion of briefing.

*

The Honorable Wendell A. Miles, U.S. Senior District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

977 F.2d 583

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Albert J. DeSANTIS, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 92-3974, 92-3978.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 30, 1992.

Before DAVID A. NELSON and SILER, Circuit Judges, and MILES, Senior District Judge.*

ORDER

The defendant appeals a district court order revoking his probation and imposing the defendant's original sentence of incarceration. That appeal has been docketed herein as Case No. 92-3978. The defendant is also appealing a district court order denying his request for bail pending his appeal of the revocation order. That appeal has been docketed as Case No. 92-3974. The defendant now moves this court for release and for expedited consideration of both appeals. The government has filed a response in opposition and the defendant has filed a motion to supplement. Upon review and consideration of the arguments presented, the court concludes that the defendant has not satisfied the criteria for release as established in 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b). Neither has the defendant demonstrated "exceptional circumstances" warranting his release. See United States v. Bell, 820 F.2d 980, 981 (9th Cir.1987).

For the stated reasons, the court AFFIRMS the order of the district court denying bail in Case No. 92-3974 and DENIES the motion for bail in Case No. 92-3978. It is further ORDERED that the motion to expedite the appeal in Case No. 92-3978 is granted. The clerk shall expedite the briefing schedule and advise the parties accordingly. Oral argument or submission shall be scheduled as soon as possible upon completion of briefing.

*

The Honorable Wendell A. Miles, U.S. Senior District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

977 F.2d 583, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-albert-j-desantis-ca6-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack