United States v. Albert Grossman

315 F.2d 94, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1991, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5832
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 19, 1963·No. 27957_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Me-Gohey, J. After a trial without a jury, the defendant was found guilty of engaging in wagering transactions without paying the special tax imposed by 26 U.S. C. § 4411 and of failing to register as required by 26 U.S.C. § 4412, and was sentenced to pay a fine totalling $2,000 and a penalty of $50. 26 U.S.C. §§ 7262, 7203, 7272. The defendant’s contentions of error at trial are without merit.

By order dated October 1, 1962, Judge McGohey denied the defendant’s motion for the return of money seized by Internal Revenue Service agents at the time of his arrest. The money having been seized and being subject to forfeiture under 26 U.S.C. § 7302, and having been administratively forfeited as prescribed by 26 U.S.C. § 7325, the motion for the return of the money was properly denied. 26 U.S.C. § 7327, 19 U.S.C. § 1618. See United States v. Heckinger, 163 F.2d 472 (2 Cir., 1947); United States v. One Pontiac Coupe, 298 F.2d 421 (7 Cir., 1962).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Albert Grossman, 315 F.2d 94, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1991, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5832 (2d Cir. 1963).

315 F.2d 94 (United States v. Albert Grossman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Philip R. Filing
410 F.2d 459 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)
Conti v. Morgenthau
232 F. Supp. 1004 (S.D. New York, 1964)
United States v. Joseph Michael Amore
335 F.2d 329 (Seventh Circuit, 1964)