United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2407SI
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * On Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa.
*
Albert Julius Griebe, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
Submitted: May 29, 1998
Filed: June 8, 1998
Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and STROM,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Applying our decision in Bousley v. Brooks, 97 F.3d 284 (8th Cir. 1996), the district court denied Albert Julius Griebe's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 sentence-related motion. The Supreme Court has now reversed our Bousley decision. Bousley v. United States, No. 96-8516, 1998 WL 244204 (U.S. May 18, 1998). Correspondingly, we now reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case to that court for further consideration of Griebe's motion in light of Bousley v. United States.
*
The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr. (United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.