United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 8, 1998·No. 97-2407·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2407SI

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * On Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa.

*

Albert Julius Griebe, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

Submitted: May 29, 1998

Filed: June 8, 1998

Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and STROM,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Applying our decision in Bousley v. Brooks, 97 F.3d 284 (8th Cir. 1996), the district court denied Albert Julius Griebe's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 sentence-related motion. The Supreme Court has now reversed our Bousley decision. Bousley v. United States, No. 96-8516, 1998 WL 244204 (U.S. May 18, 1998). Correspondingly, we now reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case to that court for further consideration of Griebe's motion in light of Bousley v. United States.

*

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr., (8th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr. (United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kenneth Eugene Bousley v. Joseph M. Brooks, Warden
97 F.3d 284 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)