United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr.
This text of United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr. (United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________
No. 97-2407SI _____________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * On Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Albert Julius Griebe, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _____________
Submitted: May 29, 1998 Filed: June 8, 1998 _____________
Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and STROM,* District Judge. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Applying our decision in Bousley v. Brooks, 97 F.3d 284 (8th Cir. 1996), the district court denied Albert Julius Griebe's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 sentence-related motion. The Supreme Court has now reversed our Bousley decision. Bousley v. United States, No. 96-8516, 1998 WL 244204 (U.S. May 18, 1998). Correspondingly, we now reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case to that court for further consideration of Griebe's motion in light of Bousley v. United States.
* The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation. A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Albert Griebe, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-albert-griebe-jr-ca8-1998.