United States v. Albert Cornelius Harris

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Albert Cornelius Harris

419 F.2d 556

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 30, 1969

Docket19648_1

StatusPublished

This text of 419 F.2d 556 (United States v. Albert Cornelius Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Albert Cornelius Harris, 419 F.2d 556 (8th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was consolidated for both trial and appeal with 419 F.2d 553. It was, however, separately argued before a different panel of judges. The same legal contentions are raised by defendant Harris as were argued by the other two defendants. The facts and law set forth in 419 F.2d 553, decided this date, are determinative of Harris’ appeal. For the reasons set forth therein, we uphold Harris’ conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case was consolidated for both trial and appeal with 419 F.2d 553. It was, however, separately argued before a different panel of judges. The same legal contentions are raised by defendant Harris as were argued by the other two defendants. The facts and law set forth in 419 F.2d 553, decided this date, are determinative of Harris’ appeal. For the reasons set forth therein, we uphold Harris’ conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 F.2d 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-albert-cornelius-harris-ca8-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack