United States v. Albert Burgess

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 28, 2015
• Docket: 15-6585
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALBERT CHARLES BURGESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cr-00017-GCM-DLH-1; 1:12-cv-00375-GCM)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville, North Carolina; Kimlani M. Ford, Cortney Randall, Edward R. Ryan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion seeking an extension of time to file a

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Burgess’ informal briefs do not challenge the basis for

the district court’s disposition, Burgess has forfeited appellate

review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED