United States v. Alaniz-Tejada

150 F. Supp. 2d 1109, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9964, 2001 WL 831266
CourtDistrict Court, D. Colorado
DecidedApril 11, 2001
Docket1:00-cv-00049
StatusPublished

This text of 150 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (United States v. Alaniz-Tejada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alaniz-Tejada, 150 F. Supp. 2d 1109, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9964, 2001 WL 831266 (D. Colo. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

COAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court are Ricardo Lopez-Turrubiartes’ Motion for Government to Pay Witness Fees... [filed March 8, 2001], and Ramiro Ochoa-Villanueva’s and Pedro Barron-Hernandez’ identical verbal motions of the same date. All three movants request the payment of witness fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(4).

I. Background

On February 20, 2001, the court granted the government’s motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3144, for the designation and arrest of the following persons as material witnesses in this alleged alien smuggling case: Ramiro Ochoa-Villanueva, A78 549 612; Ricardo Lopez-Turrubiartes, A78 549 601; Miguel Martinez-Aranda, IA78 549 602; and Pedro Barron-Hernandez, A78 294-564. Three days later, on February 23, 2001, the Court ordered all four material witnesses detained. Each had been arrested by Denver Police and the INS after they had been found in an alien smuggling load in Denver. Moreover, prior to their designation as material witnesses and subsequent detention, each had admitted to INS officials that he belonged to a class of aliens who are deportable; and each was determined to be deportable by the INS prior to designation as material witnesses.

The movants’ depositions were taken on March 5 and 6, 2001. Lopez-Turrubiartes was detained in the Federal Detention Center as a material witness from February 20, 2001 and was released on March 8, 2001. Barron-Hernandez and Ochoa-Villanueva were both detained in the Center on February 21, 2001 and released on March 8, 2001.

The three aliens now argue that they are entitled to $40 a day compensation as material witnesses pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1821(b). The Government opposes their requests and maintains that the witnesses are deportable aliens, making them ineligible for witness fees.

*1110 II. Analysis

The payment of witness fees is generally governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1821(a)(1), which provides:

(a)(1) Except as otherwise provided by law, a witness in attendance at any court of the United States, or before a United States Magistrate, or before any person authorized to take his deposition pursuant to any rule or order of a court of the United States, shall be paid the fees and allowances provided by this section... (B) A witness shall be paid an attendance fee of $40 per day for each day’s attendance.

28 U.S.C. § 1821(a)(1) and (b) (emphasis added).

With reference to detained material witnesses, § 1821(d)(4) further provides:

When a witness is detained pursuant to section 3144 of title 18 for want of security for his appearance, he shall be entitled for each day of detention when not in attendance at court, in addition to his subsistence, to the daily attendance fee provided by subsection (b) of this section.

Another subsection addresses deporta-ble aliens and their receipt of witness fees; § 1821(e) states:

An alien who... either had admitted belonging to a class of aliens who are deportable or has been determined pursuant to section 240 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1252(b)) to be deportable shall he ineligible to receive the fees or allowances provided by this section.

(Emphasis added).

Further, the Code of Federal Regulations classifies aliens with respect to the payment of fees; it states, in pertinent part:

(a) Aliens Entitled to Payment of $30 Per Day. The following aliens are entitled to witness fees and allowances provided in §§ 21.4:... Aliens who have rendered themselves amenable to deportation proceedings, but have not admitted deportability or have not been determined to be deportable pursuant to Section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1252)
(b) Aliens Entitled to Payment of $1 Per Day. An alien who is “excludable” in accordance with 8 U.S.C. 1226, but whose removal is stayed by the Attorney General (in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1227(d)) because: (1) The testimony of the alien is necessary on behalf of the United States in the prosecution of offenders against the United States, or (2) the testimony of the alien is necessary on behalf of an indigent criminal defendant in accordance with Rule 17(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedures, is entitled to a $1 per day witness fee. No other fees and allowances are authorized.
(c) Aliens Not Entitled to Payment. An alien who has been paroled into the United States for prosecution pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5) (documentary evidence: Form 1-94, Arrival-Departure Record, Parole Edition), or an alien who has admitted belonging to a class of aliens idho are deportable, or an alien tuho has been determined pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) to be deporta-ble (documentary evidence: decision by a Special Inquiry Officer, Board of Immigration Appeals, or court), is prohibited from receiving fees and alloiuances in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1821(e).

28 C.F.R. § 21.3 (emphasis added)

Here, all three material witnesses are deportable aliens by their admissions and the actions of the INS. In support of their claim to witness fees, they rely upon the opinion of Magistrate Judge Borchers in United States v. Lopez-Bustamante, 999 F.Supp. 1404 (D.Colo.1998). In that opinion, Judge Borchers analyzed § 1821 and *1111 28 C.F.R. § 21.3 and concluded that § 1821(e) does not apply to deportable aliens who are detained as material witnesses. Id.

With all due respect to Magistrate Judge Borehers, I disagree. I find instructive the Supreme Court’s 1991 Demarest

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demarest v. Manspeaker
498 U.S. 184 (Supreme Court, 1991)
United States v. Lopez-Bustamante
999 F. Supp. 1404 (D. Colorado, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 F. Supp. 2d 1109, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9964, 2001 WL 831266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alaniz-tejada-cod-2001.