United States v. Alaniz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2000·No. 00-50232·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50232 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

versus

LEROY FLORES ALANIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-99-CR-79-1 -------------------- October 18, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leroy Flores Alaniz (“Alaniz”) appeals his conviction for

being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues that 18

U.S.C. § 922(g) is unconstitutional or the district court

unconstitutionally applied § 922(g)(1) to his case.

“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the

constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See

United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 120 S. Ct. 156 (1999). Recent decisions by the Supreme

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-50232 -2-

Court have not altered this ruling. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alaniz, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Alaniz (United States v. Alaniz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Thomas De Leon
170 F.3d 494 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)