United States v. Alan Klaes
This text of 453 F.2d 1375 (United States v. Alan Klaes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
453 F.2d 1375
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alan KLAES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-2765 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 4, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1972.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Klaes' sole contention is that only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury, and therefore the indictment should have been dismissed. This contention is without merit. See Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); United States v. Gower, 447 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1971). The judgment is
Affirmed.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 F.2d 1375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alan-klaes-ca5-1972.