United States v. Alan Klaes

453 F.2d 1375
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1972
Docket99-40636
StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 1375 (United States v. Alan Klaes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alan Klaes, 453 F.2d 1375 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

453 F.2d 1375

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alan KLAES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2765 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1972.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Klaes' sole contention is that only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury, and therefore the indictment should have been dismissed. This contention is without merit. See Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); United States v. Gower, 447 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1971). The judgment is

Affirmed.

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 F.2d 1375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alan-klaes-ca5-1972.