United States v. Alan Barnett

697 F. App'x 153
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2017·No. 17-6781·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alan Boyd Donta Barnett appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to remand his closed criminal proceeding to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barnett, No. 3:12-cr-00188-FDW-DSC-2 (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alan Barnett, 697 F. App'x 153 (4th Cir. 2017).

697 F. App'x 153 (United States v. Alan Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnett v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2020