United States v. Aladekoba

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Aladekoba

421 F. App'x 299

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2011·No. No. 10-7523·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adewale Johnson Aladekoba seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying [300]*300his criminal motions and petition for writ of error audita querela in which he sought to challenge his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Aladekoba, No. 1:93-cr-00018WMN-3 (D. Md. June 1, 2010) & 2010 WL 4054267 (Oct. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adewale Johnson Aladekoba seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying [300]*300his criminal motions and petition for writ of error audita querela in which he sought to challenge his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Aladekoba, No. 1:93-cr-00018WMN-3 (D. Md. June 1, 2010) & 2010 WL 4054267 (Oct. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Aladekoba, 421 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

421 F. App'x 299 (United States v. Aladekoba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.