United States v. Aladekoba
This text of United States v. Aladekoba (United States v. Aladekoba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7523
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ADEWALE JOHNSON ALADEKOBA, a/k/a Jay Johnson, a/k/a Orlando Percival McGregory, a/k/a Wally,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:93-cr-00018-WMN-3)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adewale Johnson Aladekoba, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie Michelle Bennett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Adewale Johnson Aladekoba seeks to appeal the district
court’s orders denying his criminal motions and petition for
writ of error audita querela in which he sought to challenge his
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Aladekoba, No.
1:93-cr-00018-WMN-3 (D. Md. June 1 & Oct. 15, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Aladekoba, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aladekoba-ca4-2011.