United States v. Al-Muwwakkil

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2009·No. 09-7425·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7425

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AKEEM LABEEB AL-MUWWAKKIL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00092-RGD-1; 4:08-cv-00126-RGD)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Woodrow Hoffman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil appeals the district court’s

order denying his Rule 60(b) motion of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure in which Al-Muwwakkil attempted to revisit an

order issued during his criminal trial denying a motion to

suppress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Al-Muwwakkil, No. 4:01-cr-

00092-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Al-Muwwakkil, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Al-Muwwakkil (United States v. Al-Muwwakkil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.