United States v. Al-Kurdi

332 F. App'x 151
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 2009
Docket09-4032
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 332 F. App'x 151 (United States v. Al-Kurdi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Al-Kurdi, 332 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*152 PER CURIAM:

Mohammad B. Al-Kurdi pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to a one-count information that alleged that he engaged in a conspiracy to commit identity fraud, receipt and possession of items stolen from a bank, sale of stolen goods, and false representation of a social security number, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2006). The district court sentenced Al-Kurdi on November 19, 2008, to twenty-seven months of imprisonment, and allowed him to self-report for service of his sentence. Al-Kurdi was directed to report to begin his sentence on February 2, 2009, but failed to report and his whereabouts are unknown. Al-Kurdi’s attorney timely filed an appeal and has filed an appellate brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). For the reasons that follow, we dismiss the appeal.

“It has been settled for well over a century that an appellate court may dismiss the appeal of a defendant who is a fugitive from justice during the pendency of his appeal.” Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States, 507 U.S. 234, 239, 113 S.Ct. 1199, 122 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993). Al-Kurdi’s fugitive status “disentitles [him] to call upon the resources of the Court for determination of his claims.” Id. at 240, 113 S.Ct. 1199 (quoting Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 366, 90 S.Ct. 498, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970)).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. All Assets Listed in Attachment A
89 F. Supp. 3d 813 (E.D. Virginia, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
332 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-al-kurdi-ca4-2009.