United States v. Ajayi

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SMART ILESANMI AJAYI, Individually ) and d/b/a HARPLET MARKETING, LLC, ) TOPPS TAX SERVICES, and SMART TAX _) SERVICES, and JOANN VILLARREAL, ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-0476-C-BH

ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Plaintiff's motion for order for Defendant to show cause why he should not be in civil contempt for violating the Court's injunction order (Doc. 26] and Plaintiff's motion for order for Defendant to show cause why he should not be in civil contempt for violating the Court's injunction orders [Doc. 42] should be denied. The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 LLB, § 636(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989).

' Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the United States Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation.

After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for order for Defendant to show cause why he should not be in civil contempt for violating the Court's injunction order [Doc. 26] and Plaintiff's motion for order for Defendant to show cause why he should not be in civil contempt for violating the Court's injunction orders [Doc. 42] be DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated October AO 2021, / Uy0fy pr Ay “4 ) a . CUMMINGS / | NIOR UNITED wT] ICT JUDGE