United States v. Aivalikles

88 F. App'x 424
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2004
Docket03-1846
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 F. App'x 424 (United States v. Aivalikles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Aivalikles, 88 F. App'x 424 (1st Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Aivalikles, an attorney acting pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the government in this tax deficiency case brought under 26 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7403. In response to the government’s motion, which was supported with certified assessments for the tax years in question, appellant offered only an affidavit containing unspecific and unsubstantiated assertions that the assessments overstated the amount of unpaid tax, which he certified as “true to the best of [his] knowledge and belief.” The district court properly found the affidavit insufficient to demonstrate any triable issue with regard to the correctness of the tax deficiency assessments. See Perez v. Volvo Car Corp., 247 F.3d 303, 318 (1st Cir.2001); Cadle Co. v. Hayes, 116 F.3d 957, 960-61 (1st Cir.1997).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 F. App'x 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aivalikles-ca1-2004.