United States v. Aispuro
This text of 46 F. App'x 537 (United States v. Aispuro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alejandro Aispuro appeals the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Aispuro’s contention that section 960 is facially unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104,1109-1111 (9th Cir. 2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 F. App'x 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aispuro-ca9-2002.